aliasvault/aliasvault: Privacy-first password manager with built-in email aliasing. Fully encrypted and self-hostable. (github.com)
from R1x38rexrper@lemmy.ml to selfhosted@lemmy.world on 15 May 16:19
https://lemmy.ml/post/47398558

#selfhosted

threaded - newest

AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space on 15 May 16:27 next collapse

Has this been audited? It’s easy to claim that something is secure, but there have been products that made such claims and were trivially exploitable.

absolutetupperware@lemmy.today on 15 May 16:47 next collapse

the true audit is time, unfortunately

jay@mbin.zerojay.com on 15 May 18:04 collapse

The Github page says they are aiming to get one done soon.

dreamkeeper@literature.cafe on 16 May 02:39 collapse

They shouldn’t claim that an effing password manager is “secure” until after they’ve done an audit.

I’ll pass, thanks.

DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works on 15 May 16:47 next collapse

Per the github page “With the API stabilized, we aim to have AliasVault undergo a thorough security audit this stage. We have already initiated conversations with renowned cyber security companies who have taken interest in taking this on.”

filcuk@lemmy.zip on 16 May 22:15 collapse

I hope it doesn’t say as I didn’t bother to check - how do free projects get money for audits like this?

non_burglar@lemmy.world on 17 May 13:12 next collapse

Excellent question, because financial transparency is becoming more and more of a factor in my shift to open software.

And I suspect that there are indeed a few not-so-good actors who are abusing FOSS for political or financial gain.

DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works on 17 May 15:17 collapse

Good question. I don’t see anything about current funding. They do mention in the road map having a premium cloud subscription to cover cloud hosting.

I’m a keepass user myself. Too many hosted programs turn to crap one way or another. Let alone the trust componet. I hope for the best with this software.

hellmo_luciferrari@lemmy.zip on 15 May 16:54 next collapse

I’ll optimistically sit back and see what comes of this. I’m happy with vaultwarden.

saddlebag@lemmy.world on 15 May 21:14 collapse

It’s good to have options

fastcompany.com/…/bitwarden-scrubs-always-free-an…

asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world on 16 May 10:37 collapse

They said VaultWarden, not BitWarden. This shouldn’t affect them.

lastweakness@lemmy.world on 16 May 23:30 collapse

It could. The removal of “transparency” indicates to me that the clients might also stop being open source at some point and Vaultwarden doesn’t have its own clients.

savvywolf@pawb.social on 15 May 17:17 next collapse

One thing that jumps out at me reading the readme is the fact that it has a built in email server. Email is hard to get right, and I’m surprised a relatively young(?) project is working on getting all the moving pieces together rather than declaring it out of scope.

It’ll be interesting to see how it develops.

prenatal_confusion@feddit.org on 15 May 22:07 next collapse

Do You know more about the email server part? I understand +addressing but this seems to be more? Do You hand a domain over and it is actually a full MX or is it just an imap client?

zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 16 May 01:22 next collapse

I would never trust a newly written email server and there is absolutely no reason not to use an already existing as a dependency to this project.

Coolkat@slrpnk.net on 16 May 01:24 collapse

I’m no expert but as i understood, it’s the sending part that’s tricky to get right. Lots of handshake to handle, all to probably end up in a spam folder or blocked along the way. But receiving from a publicly acknowledged address ? I think it’s fairly simple

cron@feddit.org on 16 May 10:49 collapse

Even then, there are lots of edge cases with e-mail that are easy to get wrong and might become security risks.

I‘m not saying this applies to this project, this is more of a general concern.

Courantdair@jlai.lu on 15 May 17:57 next collapse

Looks promising! And it’s refreshing to see something that doesn’t look vibecoded in a week. Couldn’t find any AGENTS.md or other AI crap so I could actually try it

Prathas@lemmy.zip on 15 May 18:36 next collapse

They spelled “agents” backwards to throw you off! lol jk

TrumpetX@programming.dev on 15 May 19:27 collapse

This is most definitely AI assisted. I won’t say vibe coded, but this has the hallmarks.

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 15 May 22:13 next collapse

This is a claim that is meaningless. You can say it about literally any software currently in development, and there is zero way to reliably refute it.

It’s like stating your comment was AI assisted.

TrumpetX@programming.dev on 16 May 11:11 collapse

Sort of my point, actually. Most software now I’d argue is AI assisted.

slazer2au@lemmy.world on 15 May 23:25 collapse

Such as?

robocall@lemmy.world on 15 May 20:14 next collapse

Do you have thoughts on 1password?

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 15 May 20:40 next collapse

I’m curious why you asked this?…

robocall@lemmy.world on 15 May 21:32 collapse

Aren’t both of them password managers? I guess I wonder if someone has a preference for one over the other.

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 15 May 21:59 collapse

They are, it’s just odd to bring up an unrelated software.

I do use 1Password and like it, but I couldn’t compare it to this one.

OpenAltFinder@lemmy.world on 16 May 22:07 next collapse

I recently started migrating away from 1Password. I was on the individual plan for almost 5 years, but this year they would raise the price. I would happily keep paying, but I just find that the quality has just gone downhill. The Firefox extension seems to freeze up quite often, or unlocking doesn’t work, or sometimes it takes 10 seconds +…

The browser extension was also feeling a bit intrusive. It would often pop up for non-login fields. There’s also no way to disable it for specific sites.

All in all, I just grew frustrated with it, and decided to switch to Bitwarden. I’m just on the free one, so I am missing quite a bit of functionality.

Cethin@lemmy.zip on 16 May 23:19 next collapse

I don’t know why people use these services that charge you. Just use Keepass. It’s free and open source. The only disadvantage is syncthing across devices, but syncthing makes that trivial.

kepix@lemmy.world on 17 May 01:37 collapse

we used to use it at work. i hated it, cause it did not recognise any non english european character during search. i wonder what happens if someone with a full cyrillic alphabet starts to use a mess like this.

B0rax@feddit.org on 15 May 23:35 next collapse

Yes! Finally one with email aliases.

Kazel@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 16 May 02:08 next collapse

Thanks but i stick to keepass. It does the job

msokiovt@lemmy.today on 16 May 10:31 next collapse

I actually happened to use AliasVault. It’s Free Software from the Netherlands for those who are unaware.

Cyber@feddit.uk on 16 May 22:55 next collapse

Looks like an interesting project, but I just don’t understand it’s use case.

I use Keepass and I just copy the (different) email address I used to register for a site into the username field and I’m done.

No hosting required, no additional email server, etc. just credentials in a fully portable file.

Is this trying to automate email based 2FA ?

kepix@lemmy.world on 17 May 01:49 next collapse

been the number 2 recommendation after shitass proton on alternativeto.net. ui is a bit weird, but works. password generstion def needs more options tho, some sites need more number or more special characters.

altphoto@lemmy.today on 17 May 07:54 collapse

It worked right out of the box.